Robert Scribner in: Times Literary Supplement, 28/5/1982
RAINER WOHLFEIL:
Einführung in die Geschichte der
deutschen Reformation
230pp. Munich: Beck. DM26.
3 406 08675 6
JOHN M. TODD:
Luther: A Life
396pp. Hamish Hamilton. £18.
U 241 10703 2
For most of this century, Luther has
set the standard against which all
other aspects of the German Reform-
ation have been measured. Under-
standing the Reformation meant
understanding Luther and his impact;
the best introduction to the subject was
believed to be a good biography of the
man. During the past decade, how-
ever, some remarkable changes have
been taking place in Reformation
historiography, excellently summed up
in Rainer Wohlfeil's survey of recent
research. Intended largely as a student
introduction, this book is also a major
contribution to the current debate
about social historical approaches to
the Reformation, and it shows how
inadequate a Luther-centred view has
become.
Wohlfeil sketches briefly the main
phases of development of the Ger-
man Reformation, and provides an
overview of the major schools of
historiography since the sixteenth
century. He then turns to an ex-
tended discussion of the concepts
used to understand the Reformation,
pointing out that many of our com-
mon assumptions about it are imposi-
tions of later ages, rather than six-
teenth-century perceptions of events.
The notions of "Protestant" and
"Protestantism" in our modern usage
were creations of the seventeenth
century, as was "the Reformation"
itself. The concept of the "age of the
Reformation", describing an inter-
related complex of political and eccle-
siastical events, dates only from the
nineteenth century, and was the
creation of Ranke.
Doctrine is not neglected. Wohlfeil
gives a lucid account of the many
different kinds of doctrine being
preached during the first half of the
sixteenth century, indicating that it
was by no means certain that
Luther's would come to be the norm.
The reason for this is found in two
themes which receive the greater
part of Wohlfeil's attention and now
stand at the centre of recent histor-
iography of the German Reform-
ation: the wide-ranging public debate
precipitated by the "Luther affair",
which created in Germany for the
first time something resembling mod-
ern "public opinion"; and the move-
ments which arose in the wake of
this debate demanding changes not
only in religious practices but in
many other areas of life as well.
These began in the German towns,
but spilled over into the countryside,
and ranged from public assemblies,
protest meetings and minor demon-
strations to riots, urban rebellions
and the complex confrontation
known as the German Peasants'
War. Historians have yet to assess
the full measure of these movements,
but it is clear that they combined
religious with social and economic
hopes and fears, and released an
extraordinary ferment in German
society. Historians from the German
Democratic Republic consider the
entire phenomenon to have
amounted to an "early bourgeois
revolution", although Wohlfeil, in a
careful analysis of their approach,
denies the applicability of the label.
The inspiration for all these asso-
ciations was the desire, encouraged
by the example of Luther himself, to
apply Christian principles consist-
ently to the conduct of daily life. For
this reason alone, theology and
theological tendencies cannot be
ignored in any analysis. But the
Reformation movements were often
more responsive to Zwinglianism or
Anabaptism than to Lutheranism,
which became too cautious and sub-
missive to authority when faced with
serious socio-economic and ecclesias-
tical issues, especially after the
Peasants' War. Wohlfeil rightly identi-
fies Anabaptism and ecclesiastical
radicalism as a major theme in modern
Reformation historiography, although
he seriously underestimates the origi-
nality of both tendencies in seeing
them as a "reaction" to Lutheranism,
rather than independent movements in
their own right. Another similar
phenomenon, hitherto largely ignored
by historians, is iconoclasm and Wohl-
feil likewise picks out this theme, and
the wider question of the Reformation
and art, as an important field for
discussion in the years ahead.
Most important, however, is his
contention that the Reformation can
only be properly understood "in so-
cial historical perspective". Here he
echoes the views of several other
historians who maintained that the
Reformation involved not just changes
in individual belief, but forms of group
behaviour. He argues that social, poli-
tical and religious matters were inex-
tricably interlinked, and that Reform-
ation movements were more decisively
shaped by non-religious influences
than has so far been conceded by
church historians. There is only one
major omission here, Wohlfeil's failure
to discuss the recent work of Peter
Blickle, who argues that it was the
importance attached to the Gospel as a
legitimation of social protest and of the
principle of Christian liberty inter-
preted in a social context, which pre-
cipitated a near-revolution in 1524-26.
But Wohlfeil has produced an excel-
lent introduction to what deserves to
be labelled the "new Reformation
history".
To attempt any new biography of
Luther in the light of this is a hazar-
dous undertaking, demanding that
Luther be seen neither as hero nor
as saint. John M. Todd's life suc-
ceeds admirably in establishing the
human limits of the man while yet
appreciating his undoubted achieve-
ments. Todd is fascinated by
Luther's psychology, but without fall-
ing into the crude Freudianism of
Erikson's Young Man Luther. We
see Luther as a depressive personal-
ity (Todd comes close to saying man-
ic depressive), irascible, given to sex-
ual lusts, to outbursts of extraordin-
ary coarseness and obsessed with his
chronic constipation. Todd does not
refrain from criticizing him for being
often arrogant and bigoted, but this
enables us to assess Luther's true
measure as a man of boundless ener-
gy and passion for people and ideas,
and with a profound commitment to
what he held to be genuine religious
experience. This very positive side of
Luther made him a scholar and
theologian of genius, and a teacher,
pastor, husband and father of gentle
understanding and kindly humour.
Todd does not escape all the dan-
gers of the traditional biography. He
concentrates a little too much on the
"heroic years" of 1517-22 and on the
"confessional" events up to 1530
which formed the Lutheran church.
It would have been useful, however,
to have heard more about Luther's
pastoral work in the years 1528-46,
when he was engaged in the singul-
arly frustrating work of building up
this new church. We could also have
been told more about Luther's con-
tinual expectations of the Last Days,
and the waxing and waning of his
apocalyptic mood, closely related to
his growing pessimism about the pos-
sibility of forming within his own
generation genuinely pious Christian
believers. Sometimes Todd over-
dramatizes his achievements - for ex-
ample, writing of Luther's 1520 re-
form programme as "shocking in the
extent of change it demanded". Yet
it was only a few points more radical
(its theological implications aside)
than other reform plans abroad at
the time. In fact, the most shocking
of Luther's suggestions is very rarely
mentioned: that a woman with an
impotent husband is justified not
only in taking a lover, but also in
going off to live with him elsewhere
in a common-law marriage.
Sometimes Todd uses modern
terminology which sits uneasily on
descriptions of sixteenth-century
events: the pre-Reformation church
characterized as a "totalitarian pol-
ity", the terms "left", "right", "cen-
tre" used to describe the spectrum of
reform around Luther. Indeed, given
that Luther provoked one of the
major upheavals in the history of the
Christian Church, it seems quite in-
appropriate to speak of him as stand-
ing "in the centre". Occasionally
Todd translates badly: for example,
using the term "living wildly" for
wilde Ehe (common-law marriage).
There are a few minor errors of fact,
the most important of which is to
speak of the "massive violence" com-
mitted by the peasant rebels of 1524-
25 under the influence of "extremist
leaders". Such leaders rarely set the
tone of the Peasants' War, and the
amount of violence was very small by
the standards of the time, certainly
far less than that visited on the
rebels in revenge. It should be said
here that Todd's treatment of Luther's
role in the Peasants' War is an excellent
example of fair-minded historical judg-
ment.
Although Todd pays more atten-
tion to political and ecclesiastical
matters than to social or economic,
he is not unaware of recent trends in
Reformation scholarship. This may
escape the general reader in the abs-
ence of footnotes or any substantial
bibliography, but it is clear to the
specialist eye in numerous references
throughout his text. His frequent use
of careful qualifications, measured
judgments and judicious asides shows
that he is well read in all the fields
discussed by Wohlfeil and has care-
fully incorporated their findings into
his overall picture. This unassuming
use of recent scholarship throughout
enables him to avoid the danger of
producing another stock biography
and to provide a more subtle and
reflective set of standards against
which to measure Luther.
Robert Scribner